Articles Air Race (Page 16)

1988 State President’s Trophy Air Race

Held at Margate – 27 to 30 May 1988

Pos Race
No
Reg Aircraft HP H/Cap
Knots
Gain(-)
Loss
Speed
Knots
Pilot
Navigator
Province
Club
01 7 ZS-MTD Lear 25D R Schwarts/A Potgieter
G Pretoruis
Tvl
02 49 Beech B55 John Sayers
Chris Kyle
Tvl
Krugersdorp
03 37 Beech B58 Peter Walker
Marius Els

1988 State President’s Trophy Air Race

Margate – 1988

Trophy Name Awarded to Race A/c Reg Pilot/Navigator
Aircraft
State President’s Trophy The Competitor gaining most time on Handicap 7 R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius
Lear 25d
Air Charter Trophy The Second Pilot Home 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Beech B55
Vincent Maclean Trophy The Third Pilot Home 37 Peter Walker/Maruis Els
Beech 58
Natal Advertiser Trophy The Competitor covering the course in the fastest time 7 R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius
Lear 25d
Vickers Trophy The Competitor giving the Most Meritorious Performance 7 R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius
Lear 25d
Wakefield Trophy The First Woman Pilot Home 43 Maureen Forrester/Aloma Stevens
Beech 36
Natal Mercury Trophy The First Kwa Zulu Natal Pilot Home 28 C J B Proctor/A Campbell
Piper PA28-180
Hoofstad Pers Trophy The First Transvaal Pilot Home 7 R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius
Lear 25d
Northern Review Trophy The First Northern Transvaal Pilot Home 20 H Steyn/A G Steyn
Cessna C172 XP
Phoenix Volkswagen Trophy The First O F S Pilot Home 4 G Marx/Dr F G van der Merwe
Beech A36
Stellalander Trophy The First Cape Province Pilot Home 77 B Lipschitz/S Lipschitz
Beech 58P
Comair Trophy The Pilot of the First Cessna Home 20 H Steyn/A G Steyn
Cessna C172 XP
Placo Trophy The Pilot of the First Piper Home 28 C J B Proctor/A Campbell
Piper PA28-180
Beechcraft Trophy The Pilot of the First Beechcraft Home 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Beech B55
Carletonville Trophy The Pilot of the First Baron Home 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Beech B55
Southern Africa Mooney Trophy The Pilot of the First Mooney Home 39 M Otto/J van Wyk
Mooney M20
Preller/Germishuys Trophy Handicapping Committee Award 1 D C Dove/A W Dove
Piper PA28-235
Gastby Trophy Best Handicap Performance on First Day 20 H Steyn/A G Steyn
Cessna C172 XP
Stayer’s Trophy The Crew Continuing and Finishing Under Exceptional Conditions

(Entered for 12 years in same aircraft)

15 ZS-FHA Alan Hodgson/Cecil Hodgson
Piper PA28-235
Durban Wings Club Trophy The First Durban Wings Club Pilot Home 16 N Tones/M L von Guilliaume
Piper PA 28-140
Chris Swart Krugersdorp Trophy The First Krugersdorp Pilot Home 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Beech B55
Lanseria Trophy The First Lanseria based Pilot Home 3 J Errans/A Moolman
Beech B58
Commercial Aviation Trophy The Pilot Giving the Best Performance 6 Aaron Searle/Morris Jackson
Cessna Citation
Turbocharged Class The First Turbocharged Aircraft 77 B Lipschitz/S Lipschitz
Beech 58P
Turbine Class The First Turboprop/Turbojet Aircraft 7 R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius
Lear 25d
Sportsmans Class The First Team with Less Than 1000 hours 20 H Steyn/A G Steyn
Cessna C172 XP
E A A Class The First Experimental/Homebuilt Aircraft 8 D Loyally/D Hopkins
Long Geezer

1988 State President’s Trophy Air Race

IMPROVING YOUR CHANCES OF A WIN

A series of three articles written by Vic Kaiser prior to the 1988 Air Race

Part 1

Due to the high level of competition that has developed over the past years, I feel it is time to give the less experienced competitors some guidelines and techniques to improve their performance in this race.

First and foremost is NAVIGATION. The shortest distance between two points is the straight line that joins them (correct for the distances covered in this event). Unless you fly the track represented by that line on your map you will he covering a longer distance and hence reducing your chances of gaining time. Now if you are on your desired track you should also have no problem in locating the turning point early and position yourself such that you can be seen and positively identified. Penalties must be awarded if you are not identified at a turning point.

Another factor to consider under navigation is the TERRAIN you cover. Study your route carefully on the preceding day and calculate the change in elevation of the terrain enroute. Depending on the excess power. climb performance, of your aircraft, decide then when and where to climb. Rather climb early and plan for a “cruise climb” where you decrease your speed by say 10 knots whilst climbing at 200 – 300 fpm rather than flying right up to the high ground and then executing a steep climb at a much lower speed.

Associated with terrain are UP/DOWN DRAUGHTS as well as WIND. When flying in an updraught don’t try to maintain level flight but rather maintain your attitude and use the updraught to gain altitude which you can later trade for extra speed. Conversely, when encountering a downdraught fly down with the draught as far as possible changing your attitude gradually to avoid contact with the ground rather than an abrupt attitude change to maintain altitude. If however, you are very low, this obviously may not be possible.

While the above reasoning applies to crossing a ridge at say 90 degrees, when flying parallel to a ridge, you may choose to maintain a constant altitude and use the updraught to increase your speed.

Similarly expect updraughts on the windward side of the high ground and downdraughts on the leeward side and then apply the technique as discussed above. Bear in mind the manoeuvre limits of your aircraft when you encounter turbulence associated with the wind formations surrounding high ground.

Should the terrain be very flat and free from man-made obstructions and power lines AND you have the confidence and ability to do so you may elect to fly in “ground effect”. When flying in ground effect, the cushion of air below you generates additional lift. Now if you were to keep your height constant and hence your lift, you will find that your true airspeed will increase slightly whilst maintaining a constant height above the ground. Just remember to trim slightly nose up when applying this technique. This technique, however, is not recommended whilst flying over undulating terrain, as you will be in this year’s race.

However, ground effect is only effective up to a height of approximately 1/2 a wingspan. As you can see not only is it extremely difficult to fly at such a height, but additional problems with low level navigation are also encountered. (SAPFA note – this practice is actively discouraged as it increases risk significantly with an extremely low probability of a speed gain)

If you experience a tail wind cruise climb to gain altitude but remain in the tail wind as long as possible so as to maximise its effect.

Bear in mind however, if you climb too high you may he climbing “out of” a tailwind “into” a headwind segment and thereby cancel out any advantage given by the tailwind. Try to ascertain every few 100 feet whether you are gaining or losing in groundspeed before continuing. A good cue to look for lower down is to watch the ground features such as windmills, to determine the actual wind effect. The altitude gained, i.e. potential energy, can then be converted into a higher airspeed, kinetic energy. When approaching the turning point remembering that turn radius increases with an increase in speed. In order to minimise your radius of turn you will now have to increase your load factor, “g”. Know your aircraft’s structural limits as well as your own “g” capability and execute a minimum radius turn without “blacking-out” or high speed stalling whilst flying the track plotted on your map.

Also correlate the effect of a tail wind on your present leg to the next leg, as it may give you a headwind component on your next leg and thereby force you to alter your altitude. Similarly, when experiencing a headwind, change your altitude so as to minimise the negative component for the shortest time possible. Also ensure you are on track all the time whilst flying into a headwind, as any deviation will mean extra distance to be covered and hence a longer time spent in the headwind.

This article will be continued in next month’s issue and we will take a look at other factors, such as drag, weight, C of G, trim as well as various other flying techniques. By analysing each of these effects on your performance we hope to improve your chances of winning this race.

1988 State President’s Trophy Air Race

IMPROVING YOUR CHANCES OF A WIN

A series of three articles written by Vic Kaiser prior to the 1988 Air Race

Part 2

In last month’s article we looked at Navigation, Terrain, Wind and Draughts associated with terrain. As promised we will look at a few more factors starting with DRAG.

We all know what drag is and how it affects our aircraft in general, but lets take a closer look at the various components of drag. We can divide TOTAL DRAG into two major components viz ZERO LIFT DRAG and LIFT DEPENDANT DRAG. Firstly lets analyse zero lift drag.

Zero lift drag can be further divided into 3 parts viz:

  • 1. Surface friction drag
  • 2. Form drag
  • 3. Interference drag.

Surface friction drag, as the name implies, is dependant on the smoothness of your aircraft’s skin. If you polish your aircraft well and remove any unnecessary “dents” in the leading edges of your aircraft, you will minimise surface friction drag as the whole surface area of the aircraft has a boundary layer, and thus causes surface friction drag. Form drag is a factor that really only the manufacturer can minimise in the design of the aircraft. Likewise the interference drag which, for instance is found where the wings meet the fuselage etc. As a competitor in this event, you are not allowed to “fill” the rivets of the fairings in order to reduce interference drag, as that renders your aircraft as non-standard.

Next we look at LIFT DEPENDANT DRAG which we categorise into:

  • 1. Induced drag or vortex drag.
  • 2. Increments of;
    • (a) Form drag
    • (b)surface friction drag
    • (c) Interference drag.

As you remember from basic principles there exists a positive pressure below the wing and a negative pressure above the wing. Now the difference in pressure between upper and lower surfaces causes air to spill around the wing tips and to form vortices. The effect of these is to produce a downflow past the wing additional to that resulting from the production of lift. This additional downflow causes additional drag and is known as induced drag.

The factors affecting induced drag are:

  • 1. Planform
  • 2. Aspect ratio – as a pilot you have no influence on either 1 or 2.
  • 3. Lift and weight.
  • 4. Speed.

Consider weight. The higher your weight the more lift required, at a given speed to support this weight. If you require more, lift, you require a greater pressure differential between upper and lower surfaces and hence a stronger vortex resulting in higher induced drag. Keep your aircraft weight to a minimum whilst making sure it remains standard.

Lastly we look at SPEED. At a given weight. lift remains constant during level flight. Should you now increase the speed in our lift formula
L=Cl .5 P V2 S
we can see that in order to keep LIFT constant we must reduce our Cl (angle of attack). Now from the previous discussion, when we do this, we decrease the pressure differential between upper and lower surfaces thereby decreasing the vortex as well as the induced drag. After all the purpose of this race is to fly as fast as possible, and if you do this with your minimum permissible weight. you will minimise your induced drag.

Next we will look at C of G position. If we have an aft C of G we need a “lifting” force in level flight. In order to get an upward moment from the tailplane our elevator will be deflected downwards slightly, the mean camber of the whole tail section now being the same as that of the wings. The tail section now produces additional lift and if we look back at our lift formula, we can see that with all other factors contact, the V2, being TAS, must increase.

However, small and insignificant these factors may seem, remember that if you gain 1 knot at a handicap speed of 150 knots, you should gain 52,45 seconds over an average course distance. Now if you can improve your performance by say 3 knots. you gain over the whole race is already 5 minutes over your fellow competitor, in a similar aircraft who has not prepared his aircraft to fly only 3 KNOTS faster.

And finally consider your engine and your propeller. Your propeller is like a rotating wing and exhibits the same properties as an aerofoil. So if you file out all the “nicks” and polish both sides of your propeller, without removing the paint as such, you can reduce your propeller drag and at least gain 1 of the 3 KNOTS you are looking for. Set your mixture at the correct setting for your power setting and remember that provided you keep the engine parameters below the red line, you should not damage your engine in the race. The final do’s and don’ts will be continued in the next issue.

1988 State President’s Trophy Air Race

IMPROVING YOUR CHANCES OF A WIN

A series of three articles written by Vic Kaiser prior to the 1988 Air Race

Part 3

As promised, here is the final of three articles to help you in this years’ race.

In my first article I spoke about NAVIGATION and that the shortest distance between the turning points is the straight line that joins them. A lot of competitors remain within 500 m on either side of their desired track by zig-zagging from one feature to another to make good their plotted track. Although this is acceptable, it is not the shortest distance to get you to the turning point. Rather fly a CONSTANT HEADING towards a major feature further along your track and make small heading changes to adjust for drift than criss-crossing over your track several times. Remember every time you make a turn through more than 10 degrees you are slowing down your forward progress over the ground.

Now what happens when you MISS A TURNING POINT? The only way to avoid people from purposely turning short of a turning point and thereby flying a shorter distance and hence gaining incalculable time advantage, is to disqualify them from the race. Now should you inadvertently miss a turning point but wish to remain in the race, you must navigate back to the turning point and the extra time you take to do this, is the penalty you will loose for having missed the turning point in the first instance. So the sooner you turn back to the turning point, the less the time lost. However, remember there are other competitors on the same route and do not turn blindly in front of them.

Whilst on the subject of turning points I would like to remind you of the HEIGHT at which you should cross the turning point. The marshalls on the ground must visually, unassisted by binoculars, be able to read either your race numbers or aircraft registration. At 200 ft agl this is easily accomplished. If you are higher than this, it is possible misread either of the above and if you are lower than this the time period in which the marshall visually sights your aircraft is too short.

Next I will discuss the turning technique when approaching your turning point. It is always preferable to approach your turning point with excess height rather than at very low level. Firstly, positively identify the actual marshalling point at least 5NM out. Then look at your next leg and see what immediate feature there is on your next track. Locate this feature on the ground. Now lower your aircraft’s nose and allow the speed to increase up to the yellow band on the ASI while still pointing directly at the turning point marshalls. Level off at approximately 200 ft agl and maintain this speed till within approximately 300 m from your turning point before applying approximately 60 degrees of bank and increasing your “g” loading to just off max “g” permissible. Ensure that you do not lose height, start looking for the ground feature you located on your next leg, and roll out on this feature. Give your DI/compass time to settle down and before realigning and proceeding on your next leg. Obviously these figures will vary with varying aircraft speed and must be adjusted accordingly.

Finally a few DONT’S for the race:

    • 1. Don’t do a 360 degree turn in the vicinity of a turning point.
    • 2. Don’t pull up when passing over a turning point.
    • 3. Don’t overtake another aircraft on the inside of a turn.
    • 4. Don’t approach the turning point more than 90 degrees out from the inbound track.
    • 5. Don’t forget to transmit your position two minutes prior to reaching the turning point.

We look forward to seeing you all in Margate. Good luck!

1987 State President’s Trophy Air Race

Held at Mafeking – 1987

Pos Race
No
Reg Aircraft H/Cap
Knots
Gain(-)
Loss
Speed
Knots
Pilot
Navigator
01 49 ZS-EYE Piper PA28-140 117.5 14:25.15 122.46 Chris Kyle
John Sayers
02 16 ZS-ESW Piper PA28-140 117.5 11:23.81 121.37 Nick Tones
Marie Louis von Guilliaume
03 37 ZS-RMA Beech F33 169.2 09:10.91 175.72 Marius Els
Peter Walker
04 4 ZS-JFN Beech A36 168.2 08:33.21 174.21 G Marx
F G van der Merwe
05 53 ZS-EXZ Piper PA28-180 123.5 07:04.65 126.19 Dr P du Plessis
P du Plessis
06 59 ZS-LGE Piper PA28-161 122.7 06:38.39 125.23 Vic de Villiers
Orpheus Panayiotou
07 26 ZS-FTX Piper PA28-140 117.5 06:04.83 119.69 Z Patinos
L Hayward
08 32 ZS-JEF Piper PA28-235 143.0 05 53.67 145.91 G Bouwer
D Visser
09 5 ZS-CUX Cessna C172 111.2 05:42.01 112.97 N Kruger
M Welgemoed
10 52 ZS-EAZ Meyers 200C 160.5 05:20.10 163.82 I Pollock
J van Zyl

1987 State President’s Trophy Air Race

Rand Airport, Germiston – 1987

Trophy Name Awarded to Race A/c Reg Pilot/Navigator
Aircraft
State President’s Trophy The Competitor gaining most time on Handicap 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Piper PA28-140
Air Charter Trophy The Second Pilot Home 16 Nick Tones/Marie Louis von Guilliaume
Piper PA 28-140
Vincent Maclean Trophy The Third Pilot Home 37 Marius Els/Peter Walker
Beech F33
Natal Advertiser Trophy The Competitor covering the course in the fastest time 77 Barry Lipschitz/Sue Lipschitz
Beech 58P
Wakefield Trophy The First Woman Pilot Home 43 Maureen Forrester/Aloma Stevens
Beech 36
Natal Mercury Trophy The First Kwa Zulu Natal Pilot Home 16 Nick Tones/Marie Louis von Guiliame
Piper PA 28-140
Hoofstad Pers Trophy The First Transvaal Pilot Home 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Piper PA28-140
Northern Review Trophy The First Northern Transvaal Pilot Home 32 G Bouwer/D Visser
Piper PA28-235/250
Phoenix Volkswagen Trophy The First O F S Pilot Home 4 G Marx/Dr F G van der Merwe
Beech A36
Stellalander Trophy The First Cape Province Pilot Home 6 Aaron Searle/Graham Fig
Beech E55
Comair Trophy The Pilot of the First Cessna Home 50 N D Kruger/M J Welgemoed
Cessna C172
Placo Trophy The Pilot of the First Piper Home 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Piper PA28-140
Beechcraft Trophy The Pilot of the First Beechcraft Home 37 Marius Els/Peter Walker
Beech F33
Carletonville Trophy The Pilot of the First Baron Home 58 Vic Dickerson/Daan Pretoruis
Beech B55
Southern Africa Mooney Trophy The Pilot of the First Mooney Home 27 Andrew Torr/Tony Torr
Mooney M20F
Preller/Germishuys Trophy Handicapping Committee Award 54 Connie Conradie/Dave Trent
Gastby Trophy Best Handicap Performance on First Day 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Piper PA28-140
Durban Wings Club Trophy The First Durban Wings Club Pilot Home 16 Nick Tones/Marie Louis von Guilliaume
Piper PA 28-140
J L P C Trophy The First Johannesburg Light Plane Club Pilot Home 59 Vic de Villiers/Orpheus Panayiotou
Piper PA28-161
Chris Swart Krugersdorp Trophy The First Krugersdorp Pilot Home 49 John Sayers/Chris Kyle
Piper PA28-140
Lanseria Trophy The First Lanseria based Pilot Home 15 Alan Hodgson/Cecil Hodgson
Piper PA28-235
Commercial Aviation Trophy The Pilot Giving the Best Performance 77 Barry Lipschitz/Sue Lipschitz
Beech 58P

1985 Barnib State President’s Air Race

Held at Virginia Airfield, Durban – 31 May to 1 June 1985

By Allan Blain and Colin Jordaan

For the first time in many years a coastal venue was chosen for the 19th State President’s Trophy Air Race. The coastal weather again showed its moody and unpredictable nature, but luckily held up and allowed competitors to complete the event.

Race 26 Junkers JU 52 pictured with the crew.
Race 26 Junkers JU 52 pictured with the crew.

Race 26 Junkers JU 52 pictured with the crew.Some early arrivals on Wednesday 29th May saw the dark, wet, cold and windy side of Natal weather, but preparation day, Thursday 30th, was magnificent. And as old friends from past races were reunited, aircraft were being tested by the handicapping committee, and slowly the old excitement always generated by the S.P., started building up.
As the route was only announced the day before the race, eager pilots and navigators filed into the Elangeni Hotel hall for the briefing that night. Most pilots were staying at the Elangeni and accommodation proved to be very enjoyable. That night the traditional Mayoral Cocktail Party was held, and was as drab as always.

This year the mood of the race was somewhat more staid and dignified as apposed to some previous years (Vryheid comes to mind immediately). Possibly the current economical climate made the entrants more aware of the costs of the Race, leaving them a little more sober. As it was, only 61 aircraft completed the event, substantially down on previous years. After giving the pilots their briefing, Mike Hartley stressed the safety aspects of the race, and wished all pilots godspeed.

And so the first race day, Friday, dawned and after a superb Southern Suns breakfast on the Elangeni pool deck, everyone set course for Virginia. Pilots were frantically polishing and preparing their aircraft to get just that extra knot or two that can mean victory. Some aircraft owners even go to the trouble of re-spraying their aircraft before every S.P., thats real dedication for you. Some go to even greater lengths to prepare their aircraft and its a pity that many don’t ever see the reward for those extra rands spent on being more competitive. Here we refer specially to a veteran of past races, Danie Pretorius. However take off time approached and the hot ships, who leave first for safety reasons, were fired up and ready.

Previous years winner Robbie Schwartz and the Trophy in 1994.
Previous years winner Robbie Schwartz and the Trophy in 1984.

At one minute intervals, starting at 11.00 am, aircraft left Virginia airport, and the race was on. Here I sign off and leave Colin Jordaan, veteran Springbok Pilot to give you his version of the first days route – Hibberdene – Kokstad – Weenen – Virginia.

Ever since the takeoff format for the first day was changed, (in the interest of safety the fast planes go off first) I have found the first day in the previous three races to be a bit boring. Having been placed at the back of a gaggle of Skylanes this year, my pilot, Harry Donde and I, were looking forward to “eating” a few before we got back to Virginia.

After take off on 05, Harry flipped it over the dune and was back on the deck in seconds, heading straight for the harbour mouth entrance. After quite a few test runs at Grand Central we had determined that our Skylane does absolutely no better one metre off the ground than at five. That’s of course if there is no headwind! We had a howling one.

Picked up the crane at the entrance, one degree left to take us around the outside. Decided to go over the top of the Bluff. Skylane in front of us had stayed low going around the left. His mistake. We “ate” him after about another four minutes. Total elapsed time, eight minutes and he had taken off one minute ahead of us.

Some of the competing aircraft at Virginia
Some of the competing aircraft at Virginia

Set heading to Hibberdene. The straight line was going to take us about two miles out to sea. We went for it. Scanning engine instruments suddenly took on a new meaning. By the time we dipped a wing over Hibberdene, we had “eaten” two more Skylanes and Donde and Jordaan were grinning like the cat that got the mouse. Total elapsed time, twenty-five minutes.

Set course for Kokstad. Heavy crosswind from the left, no choice but to climb slowly to get out of very heavy turbulence and also to clear the 7000 ft mountain 20 miles short of Kokstad. Height required over Kokstad – 5300 ft. 300 F.P.M. descent after the mountain should do it. We “ate” our fourth Skylane going over the mountain but he had more height and beat us into the turn. These were our old adversaries In ZS-KOW and last year they had proved to be faster than us in a straight line although we had beaten them overall. 50 Minutes gone and we had caught up 2 minutes on KOW. It was going to be a good race, or so we thought. Climbed high for the leg to Weenen to get the roaring tailwind. Quick ground speed calculation gave us 171 knots, 31 knots up on handicap.

Neck and neck with KOW over the right-hander at Weenen. Something was going wrong. We should have pulled away by now. We then realised that our plane was obviously faster at lower altitudes, so it was on the deck. All the way to Melmoth and Umhloti river mouth, which was the finish for day one. As we dropped into the thicker air, we managed to pull away slowly and crossed the line 7 seconds ahead of KOW, nearly “eating” an Arrow that was obviously out for a Sunday cruise.

Competitors attach race numbers in preparation for day one.
Competitors attach race numbers in preparation for day one.

Competitors attach race numbers in preparation for day one.That evening after a second briefing at 5.00 pm, pilots and navigators were treated to a cabaret show at the Elangeni. By now the customary bickering about all things handicapped, was well underway. This is one aspect of the race that should be turned into a commercial proposition. I am convinced a long-playing record featuring the mind boggling variety of criticisms, objections, advise and very occasional praise of the Handicapping Committee would go gold in months. The best way to confuse an S.P. competitor is to simply tell him not to come next year if he is all that miserable about his handicap speed. That, is naturally, out of the question.

Saturday arrived and competitors woke up to a dark broody and overcast day. The take off was postponed until 1.00 pm to enable the dignitaries to enjoy the sights of the start. There was naturally some muttering about that. Even though it was cool, take off at midday still meant a bumpy ride, and the weather looked more threatening as 1.00 pm approached. But the rain stayed away and with a few slower aircraft dwarfed by the junkers on the threshold, the flag dropped and the second and last stage got underway. I was on board Iron Annie, but more about that next month. The route for Saturday was Umhlanga, Ulundi, Piet Retief, Wakkerstroom, Virginia, and I’ll let Colin tell you more.

It was obvious when I opened the curtains of my hotel room that it was going to be a fast plane’s race. Low cloud and blustery south easter blowing. We might as well have been In Cape Town.

Just touching the waves, a competitor completes day one at Umhloti.
Just touching the waves, a competitor completes day one at Umhloti.

Just touching the waves, a competitor completes day one at Umhloti.Harry and I were lying in seventh place in his Cessna Skylane. I had calculated that we were 2 min 25 secs down on our handicap time for the first day. Marius Els and Vic Dickerson in their B55 Baron were already in the lead, having bettered their handicap time on the first day by 1 min 54 secs. It is amazing how you throw away tried and tested strategy when you know you have no chance of winning. Our first two legs to Ulundi and Piet Retief were forecast to have tailwinds. Instead of climbing, we decided to stay low and utilize ridgelift to improve our speed. It didn’t work. By the time we got to Piet Retief, KOW was catching us fast. We were starting to pass quite a few planes now and at Piet Retief we got our first glimpse of the Junkers. They were going great guns and although their handicap was 20 knots slower than ours we hadn’t overtaken by the time we turned over Wakkerstroom. It was actually a beautiful sight to see those three loaned Harvard engines belching out smoke as Capt. Gus Schoeman wound up the boost to clear the mountains on the way to Utrecht. We “ate” the Junkers clearing the mountains but found ourselves being zapped by Alan & Cecil Hodgson in ZS-FHA, a Cherokee 235. This was the first plane to pass us and we still had 155 miles to go. Only two other planes ahead at this stage. The Navion and the Doves in their 235. Beautiful up-draughts over the Buffelsrivier, saw the ASI almost going up into the red. Our big wing seemed to be giving us more lift than the Hodgsons 235 and we started to gain again slowly.

Race Winners - Maruis Els and Vic Dickerson with State President P W Botha.
Race Winners – Maruis Els and Vic Dickerson with State President P W Botha.

Race Winners – Maruis Els and Vic Dickerson with State President P W Botha.At this stage, Brian Wallace in the right hand seat of the Junkers, calmly informed me (in between mouthfuls of caviar) that my boss, Capt. Schoeman, was ordering me to do two 360’s to the left, starting NOW! Hardly heard him because we had just spotted Marlus Els and Vic Dickerson shooting through underneath us, and this with still another 100 miles to go. There was nothing left to do now but pray.

With only 15 miles left to go, the visibility was dropping fast, with quite a few showers in the Hazelmere Dam area. The Barons were coming through thick and fast but we were still the leading Cessna. Suddenly this Cardinal RG was filling our rear windscreen and slipping through past us to beat us across the line by mere seconds.

Left turn heading 060°, maintain 300 ft to the rocks, climb to 1000 ft and left turn back to the field. By this time 4 planes had slipped in front of us but what the heck. The positions over the line were all that counted. Our 10th place enables us to keep our boast about the only team flying the same aircraft being in the first ten, four times in a row.
We’ll be back next year like all the rest, bitten by the bug. We’ll have to think about a different aircraft though. We’re convinced no Skylane will ever win the race for quite a while. Mind you, that’s what all the losers were saying about their aircraft. To Marius & Vic, well done, see you again next year.

Aeronews cover page - Virginia 1985
Aeronews cover page – Virginia 1985

And first over the line, literally seconds ahead of the 2nd placed Navion (Ret Orsrnond ’83 winner) was ZS-KKZ, a Beech B55 with Marius Els and Vie Dickerson taking the ultimate prize in Power Flying. A word must be said about Vic, as I don’t think there is a more deserving winner. He has been very well placed many times in the S.P., and is extremely competitive, and works extremely hard. This competition was very rough, with 2nd and 3rd going to the winners of the last two years races.

And another Race ended, another victory for one lucky pilot and navigator. But as our State President said at the Prize giving banquet during a rather entertaining speech; in essence, all the pilots are winners, and its a pity there can only be one Victor. Aero Club Chairman, Major General James Gilliland, introduced President Botha, who handed the trophy to an overawed Vic Dickerson and Marius Els. He then presented the President with a number of prizes and it was gratifying to see President Botha’s appreciation, and hear the words of praise he had for our Aero Club Chairman. It was also good to see such a senior group of dignitaries present at the banquet, that apart from a dreadful consomme soup, was a very elegant occasion. The evenings prize-giving continued and finally, dodging all the paper planes, happy and sad pilots said farewell for another year. And one more in a long line of fine races drew to an end.

P.S. A special thanks to Barnib for their sponsorship, thanks to Mike Hartley, Charles Wotherspoon and Jane Davidson, thanks to the Handicapping Committee and all the judges and marshals and timekeepers. Thanks to Trevor Conlyn for a lift on the B19, to Joe Papke for being the nice guy he is. Absolutely no thanks to Glen Ball and Paul Botha who by means of forcing a dozen milk stouts down my throat, made me a vary confused editor.

Flying the Junkers in the Air Race